Commentary
Article
Though new treatments offer hope, careful monitoring and understanding of risks remain essential for their success.
The most common types of lung cancer are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). NSCLC is the most common type, accounting for around 80% to 85% of cases. It can be divided into 3 subtypes: adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma. Although these subtypes arise from different cells in the lungs, they are generally treated similarly and have comparable prognosis.¹
Image credit: Utah51 | stock.adobe.com
Adenocarcinoma is the most common subtype of NSCLC. It originates from the mucus-producing epithelial cell layer in the lungs and is commonly found in both current and former smokers, although it is the most common type in non-smokers, as well. This subtype of lung cancer is also more commonly diagnosed in women and younger individuals.1
Squamous cell carcinoma arises from flat cells lining the airway and has strong associations with smoking. It usually develops in the central region of the lungs and is close to the main bronchi. In contrast, large cell carcinoma can occur within any part of the lung and is known for its rapid potential towards growth and metastasis, which makes it more difficult to treat. A subtype of large cell carcinoma known as large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is aggressive like SCLC but affects the neuroendocrine aspect of the lungs.¹
According to data from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), lung cancer accounted for approximately 1.8 million deaths globally in 2020 and an estimated 2.2 million new lung cancer cases. There were approximately 234,580 new cases diagnosed in 2024 and estimated 125,070 deaths in the United States. The 5-year relative survival from 2014 to 2020 was 26.7%, with a new case rate of 49.0 per 100,000 men and women per year. The death rate was 32.4 per 100,000 men and women per year during the same period.2
Common treatment options for NSCLC include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Targeted therapies offer personalized treatment for lung cancer based on specific genetic and immune markers. For instance, adagrasib (Krazati; Bristol Myers Squibb), a KRAS G12C inhibitor, has been shown to improve progression-free survival in KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC.3 Meanwhile, afatinib (Gilotrif; Boehringer Ingelheim) and erlotinib (Tarceva; Genentech) target EGFR mutations, with afatinib showing strong results in the LUX-Lung trials and erlotinib benefiting patients after chemotherapy.
Alectinib (Alecensa; Genentech), an ALK inhibitor, is used in both metastatic and adjuvant settings for ALK-positive NSCLC to reduce recurrence.4 Additionally, atezolizumab (Tecentriq; Genentech), a PD-L1 inhibitor, is approved post-surgery for stage 2–3A NSCLC, while bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech) targets VEGF to block angiogenesis in non-squamous NSCLC.3,5-7
Notably, cemiplimab (Libtayo; Regeneron), a PD-1 inhibitor, nearly doubled survival in high PD-L1 NSCLC.8 Durvalumab (Imfinzi; AstraZeneca) improves outcomes in stage 3 NSCLC and limited-stage SCLC.4 Trastuzumab deruxtecan (Enhertu; Daiichi-Sankyo, AstraZeneca) is the first HER2-targeted therapy for HER2-mutant NSCLC.9 Lastly, Ipilimumab (Yervoy; Bristol Myers Squibb), combined with nivolumab (Opdivo; Bristol Myers Squibb), is approved for PD-L1-positive metastatic NSCLC, offering significant survival benefit in the CheckMate 227 trial.10 Together, these therapies underscore the importance of molecular testing and immunotherapy in modern lung cancer care.4,6,8
Targeted lung cancer treatments often cause adverse effects such as fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, and skin rashes. Immune-based drugs can trigger inflammation in organs like the lungs or liver, while others, like bevacizumab, may lead to bleeding or high blood pressure. Though effective, these medications require close monitoring to manage potential risks. As lung cancer treatments advance, targeted therapies are shifting care toward personalized medicine. Though they offer new hope, careful monitoring and understanding of risks remain essential for their success.